Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Alan Wegner, a partner at the law firm of Harrington, Hoppe & Michell said he’s ‘suspicious’ about energy companies who want to amend current leases, according to Dan O’Brien at The Business Journal.
Chesapeake Energy is seeking to increase its unit size for Ohio’s Utica Shale drilling sites. Chesapeake said increasing the size is for efficiency, but Wegner thinks it’s for a different reason:
I’m suspicious that the real reason, particularly Chesapeake, given its obvious financial situation, is to get the most out of these leases they signed and flip them to other companies such as BP and Consol,” Wenger said. “They don’t need 1,280 acres to drill a well.
Wenger suggests consulting an attorney before signing any amendment.
» Via: The Business Journal.
Farm and Dairy, a weekly newspaper located in Salem, Ohio, has been reporting on topics that interest farmers and landowners since 1914. Through the Shale Gas Reporter, we are dedicated to giving our readers unbiased and reliable information on shale gas development.
© Copyright 2024 - Farm and Dairy
After reading Alan Wegners comments about being suspicious on amending our leases, what should a land owner do to feel comfortable about waiting out for some kind of compensation for amending a lease? The oil companies tell me they don’t pay for amendments and if I don’t sign what they have then I’m not going to be left out as part of the unit which is planned.